Bluray vs web x265 reddit. I know the handbrake transcodes for h.

Bluray vs web x265 reddit I think x265 10-bit medium will produce a very good looking picture for most people with reasonable file size. Part 3. including the creation dates. 40:1 / 23. Many services make this process very difficult, resulting in people doing a “web rip” which could be similar to using something like OBS Studio to record your web browser as you watch a video (and if you know anything about OBS, the recording quality is subject to the same encoding “art” described in my previous comment). DTS-HD. All this makes DVD much more challenging to compress and preserve the original quality than Blu-ray. 2G in size. 2 days ago · UHD Blu-ray discs, Netflix Disney and other 4K videos all use H265 encoding. How much you can shrink a source file depends on many aspects. The most closest thing to the source are remuxes. Typically you'll want to match quality or file size to get a reasonable point of comparison. problem is these rips dont detail the source. Edit: Sorry I should have specified 1080P Blu-ray rips. If bit rates are ok for a 4k video web-dl is the way to go. Software encoding, in my experience, is still superior (when I compared x264 Medium to NVENC). 0 (web-dl) vs AC-3 5. As well as the fact that 720x480 pixels is just not very much to work with. HDR. Year. Remux grain is marginally acceptable, but still rather annoying and distracting. The question is, will the files look better and be a smaller file size? A lot of web releases lately have had DV or HDR10+ (sometimes both available) for their initial release on streaming, only to get a Blu-ray release that has HDR10. Also, another question: Are all ”2160p HEVC Remux What I learned is, bottom line, x265 yield much better quality for low bit rate encoding result. This is due to either too many files or the size of the files. HEVC/x265 does well as low bitrates, where there is huge quality loss except for things like anime. Leave the normal Bluray-2160p. It's supposed to be a replacement for the "old", but widely supported and used H264. In this case, AMZN meaning it was ripped from Amazon Prime Video. Of course, x265 is a more mature encoder than SVTAV1, which is why many people use it--SVTAV1 1. think my best bet is keeping the TV shows i want to keep and rewatch (GoT, band of brothers etc. So of course bluray picture quality will be better. The choice between them should be based on h. x265-RARBG They are identical in size : 1,512,945 KB I then stuck them both through MediaCompare and they are indeed identical other than the file name. I was able to find the AMZN version correctly named on PHD so sonarr was able to grab it, but i think i have to change back to WEB being WEB-DL and WEBRIP so that it will start to download the incorrect named WEB-DL's. BluRay. These discs demand special hardware to run, popularly called "Blu-ray Players. I've done double blind tests with lossless/lossy audio and with a sufficient bitrate I can't hear the difference. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now (2 330 kb/s, x264 8 bit) vs 3. Blu-rays are better in almost all situations. 2020 So it looks like the bitrate is 14Mb/s This is also from Tigole and uploaded by QxR, which I've heard are good McLaren. A file of exact same size and length would have double the “quality” in x265. But when you go above average 3Mbps encoding setting per file, x265 is not better than x264. 1 audio where Netflix I think is using DD or DD+. This video played perfectly on the Plex android app and on the Plex video-player on Windows but when I try to play the same video in the browser it buffers like crazy. Will I see any difference in quality between the… Lossless audio is like playing back a cd vs lossy is like playing back an mp3. Some people have higher standards for how much detail should be retained than others and some shows require much more bitrate. ) in 1080p Bluray x264, then the others I'm not too fussed about in 1080p x265 rips. As for HEVC, that comes in the form of H265 or x265. Depends how hardcore you want to go and what your tolerances are, obviously. I noticed that Sonarr's default "HD - 720p/1080p" profile ranks Bluray-720p and WEB 720p higher than HDTV 1080p. x264 runs on everything. In the literal big picture, a 50% avg bitrate loss on HEVC encode is usually unnoticeable to most in terms of quality, and most TVs today add some level of post processing to make up that difference, though some are bad at it. If everything was x265 many people wouldn't be able to use them. But h. This means the Blu-ray can use more data to represent each frame, resulting in a clearer and more detailed image than the highly compressed 4K video stream. 7 GB Video : HEVC / Main 10@L5@Main / 14. 4k bluray is x265 and 1080p bluray is x264, that is why REMUX of 1080p will be 20-30gb, but 4k will only be about double that size 40-60gb. TL:PL : Le deuxième meilleur format c'est le Blu-Ray remuxé (ou rippé) (Apparement, ripper et remuxer c'est à peu près la même chose) Pour gagner encore de la place, il est possible de réencoder le blu-ray pour qu'il soit plus compressé. It will likely be in h264 or h265 for the codec. Kong. Dark. Keep in mind this is only on full 1:1 rips. " Blu-ray file format serves as a superior and better version to Web-DL and DVDs. But also keep in mind, blu ray discs are ALREADY encoded. The major variables include your TV, your streaming platform and/or device, internet speed and related equipment, access, provider and location. Personally I do not have an adequate home stereo to even notice, but if you do the 1080p blu ray version will probably be better. 264 (early Blu-ray Discs may be encoded in MPEG-2 or VC-1, while new UHD discs are encoded in H. HDTV is ripped from a TV broadcast, and will often be encoded from 1080i or even 720i WEB-DL will be ripped from iTunes, Amazon prime video or Netflix or similar, the quality isn't bad but it is stream optimized and may use higher compression levels. The codecs and sources are two different things. x265 is the video codec, i. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. This is a subreddit for people interested in blu-ray, ultra blu-ray and in general physical media. x264, ). If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. 265 (10bit) Dolby Vision 6 212 Kb/s As a side note, my TV is compatible HDR10+ but not Dolby Vision. Size isn’t an issue but it is important. x265-RARBG (1. RARBG was slightly better than YIFY despite being smaller, because x265 will give same quality as a x264 encode with 40% higher bitrate. Web-dl/webrip are transcoded from streaming sites. 0 Mb/s / 3 840 pixels / 1 608 pixels / 2. Why are there no BluRay torrents for the latest movies? x265 10-bit veryslow vs slower vs slow I made the mistake of encoding my whole library with x264 10-bit, so now I need to re-encode all of it. On perd un peu en qualité mais la plupart du temps ça passe, c'est une histoire de compromis. 2160p WEB with the lossless audio track from the Blu-ray x265 at lower bit-rates is certainly more significant and will offer the best picture quality. The same subjective quality requires less data (50%?). So let's say you take a raw BluRay file and encode it 3 times at consistent quality in x265, x264, and MPEG-4. 4K, HDR10+ and Dolby Vision - Probably the best 4K version out right now if you have a device that can support Dolby Vision and HDR. It is far more complicated than this and it depends from case to case, but usually blu-ray rips win when it comes to image quality The video bitrate for a full bluray is going to be a lot higher than for a Web-DL. 1 Silence) Seven Worlds, One Planet (2019) Season 1 S01 (2160p BluRay x265 HEVC 10bit HDR AAC 5. Remux hevc vs blu ray The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. 265. HDR web is what you will see with 2160p web streaming download. I would go for the REMUX, maybe delete some after, or buy extra storage. The reason for this is that makemkv puts the episodes out in the order intended without you having to go looking through all the m2ts files manually. If you want the highest quality you should simply get a proper client able to play H. 265, not on the features of x264 vs x265. Blu-ray/remux will be in 20gb+ (the best you can get) BD Rip's are garbage and are in the 800mb-1gb range BR Rip's also garbage and are in the 1gb range Web-DL and Web rips fall in the 3-10gb+ range Blu ray rencodes/scene rips are in the 6-15gb range give or take. Id like to point out a middle ground: If you download the blu ray remux and then transcode it to medium quality, you can get a file thats still noticably higher quality than web rips , but is much smaller than a full remux H265/HEVC is a video codec. The true source of highest quality is the raw format files taken by the camera. 26* vs x. x264 actually picks out more grain, and x265 is a much smoother codec. There are better release groups out there by a long shot. You can look at x265 encodes too to get 5. I will passthrough Atmos and DTS-X, however, to keep the object based audio track. X265 is far more capable than avc/x264 so consider that too. All that said, in general if done by a skilled encoder, an encode from a Blu-ray is generally going to be higher quality than a Web-DL. H265 has a higher compression rate (compared to H264), and to achieve the same definition, H265 may only need half the bit rate of H264. 265 are mostly 4k remuxes and web downloads. This is the appeal of x265 and why it is used for UHD content like UHD BluRay discs. x265 Low Quality: siq 6CH. They are doing encodes for brand new movies and older as well. Nov 30, 2019 · In August 2016, Netflix published a comparison of x264, VP9, and x265 using video clips from 500 movies and TV shows using 6 different quality metrics and found that both VP9 and x265 have A blu-ray often comes directly from the studio who made the film and can max out the respective capacity of the disk they're on. The ~8gb x264 and the ~5gb x265 will look pretty close. Difference Between Web-DL and Blu-Ray. personally, I will always sacrifice a bit of sharpness just to have HDR10 and bt2020 because my oled tv performs much better in HDR (800nits) than SDR (300nits). 1 means that it supports up to 5. You preserve the "Original Quality" bitrate from the disc. I’m planning on upgrading to a bigger TV on Black Friday so I can’t really compare well right now. I have to try reeeaaal hard to spot differences. live action, movie vs TV series, frame rate, 4k vs 1080p vs 720p etc. If you have a HD BluRay and compress the hell out of it to say 4mbit because it looks good on your 720p TV but then in the future it looks like shit on your 8k TV, then yes, you are right. Not entirely sure. Netflix, I think even with 4K, only maxes out at like 15mbps. When considering WEBRip vs Blu-ray rip, the Blu-ray will likely offer better overall quality due to its higher bitrate and absence of streaming compression artifacts. 1. You need a lot(!) more patience/processing when you encode/compress the video (5-20x?) and slightly(2x?) more processing power when watching it. HEVC. Consider whether there are potential hardware upgrades in your future that might be more revealing of flaws. ahh ic, remux is where its at. I have ripped and put plenty of DVDs on my server, but this is the first time I would go Blu-Ray for a rip. Web-dl are also encoded which you can make out that don't have black strips. REMUX-FraMeSToR. If you have a 4K HDR TV like LG CX or C2 OLED, almost always get Blu-ray encodes due to how they handle the color space and actually supporting “Dolby Vision. Jul 21, 2018 · Take notes on file sizes and encoding speeds (command line x265 reports your fps). P2P groups will tend to specify between WEB-DL and WEBRip. example AAC 2. will look into remux next time Jan 13, 2022 · Dune (2021) 4k Blu-ray still (notice more definition and color in Chani’s eyes) When we did our initial review of Dune (2021) streaming on HBO Max we had a feeling the higher-quality bitrates DVDRip has a smaller file size than Blu-ray rips due to lower resolution. (Samsung Qe75qn90ba) Thanks in advance for your help. These days, encoders are much better about x265 being more about quality than the small file size. ” If you just have a standard 1080p TV, just do the WEB-DL. But if you keep that HD BluRay with a high bitrate then reripping it in the future for an 8k or 16k or whatever will not yield any difference. There's a lot of encodes out there in 1080p x265 that were uploaded at least 5 or more years ago that are honestly pretty crappy encodes. 1 release. 1080p Blu-ray is ok too, Blu-ray is usually far more better at audio quality tho. I generally want the quality closest to source. Very occasionally the 4K UHD is a half-assed upscale from the 1080p Blu Ray master. Is there any reason to suspect the bluray rip will be of better quality than the web dl? I set up a Raspi4 with Plex today and threw on a 1080p mkv x265 file. 265). A ~5gb x265 encode from Silence or Afm72 or somebody is going to look way better than a ~2gb x264 RARBG or YTS encode. x264 files are bigger, but don't require as much CPU to decode and is supported on almost every device sold in the past ~10 years. 2021. DTS is slightly less lossy than Dolby Digital. 79 GB (4 998 kb/s, x265 10 bit). Godzilla. quality when adjusted for file size should be the same as they both use the h264 codec, though the 10gb file will obviously have better quality overall than the 4gb one. The Bluray rips start at 22G x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. Personally I could not. Remuxes (in MKV format) allow you to preserve multiple audio and subtitle tracks. 264 vs h. Now there are some shitty x265 encodes out there. 265 10-bit. My entire collection is x265 (except the few rare cases only x264 exists). So technically, when a scene encodes a blu ray rip. Blue Planet II (2017) Season 1 S01 (2160p BluRay x265 HEVC 10bit HDR AAC 5. x265 is a encoding library that is designed to encode content into the High Efficency Video Coding (HEVC, also known as H. Alien 3 1992 Special 'Assembly Cut' Edition (1080p x265 10bit Joy). Bluray remuxes will always be better than webdls and webdls will almost always be better then tvrips. There are a few variations of WEB releases, mainly WEB-DL and WEBRip. i would download the x264 because its size is larger, but i'm confused because of the 10bit/8bit stuff. 264 are mostly 1080p Blu-ray remuxes. 9fps on slower. 4K content is already in HEVC, file sizes of 4K remux can be 25-80GB! Dunkirk. Scene groups will not specify the type of WEB release their content is and will simply use WEB instead of specifiying WEB-DL or WEBRip. MA. Many 4K WEB-DL's are bit-starved fake upscales with awful HDR grading so the Blu-ray version will be superior. 5gb file size Another is supposedly a bluray Rip 1080p at 8,857 bitrate but the file size it bigger at 17gb. x264 and x265 are the encoders (that's the difference between h. Most WEB-DL sources are direct rips of the source and have EAC3 5. It is not reencoded compared to the bluray, its the same thing but as an mkv. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). 1 audio for releases from the past few years and anything older than that is generally AAC 5. mkv Alien VS Predator AVP Unrated - Sci-Fi 2004 Eng Subs 1080p [H264-mp4]. I basically just always have a low-power CPU encode of a Blu-ray rip running in the background, h. Remuxes are direct rips of the disk usually put into a mkv container. TL;DR: Trying to cut file size when encoding TV eps but want file closest to source. HDR 15GB. Which is usually higher quality, assuming similar file size and also assuming whoever ripped/encoded did a decent job, HDTV x265 or Bluray x264? And I know it doesnt matter but the x265 is 1080p and the x264 is 720p. In theory the 4k version should be higher quality, but my guess is they probably both suck. vs. Would a 1080 BluRay version look better, probably but it's just not that big a difference for me to care. My x264 settings were transparent to the bluray source as far as i could tell, and had an average of about 11. Hey guys, I'm a big fan of REMUXes, but currently I'm thinking to grab encodes too, im not in HDB myself, but as you know, HDB is famous for its internal groups releases (specifically encodes), and I heard in another thread that the high quality encode have to be (Transparent) in another words, there is no difference between the transparent encode and REMUX, so my questions are, BluRay 4KLight DOLBY VISION/HDR10+ x265 10Bit 4 971 kb/s Vs HEVC/x265/h. But as I mentioned, there are situations where a blu-ray won't exist and you need to fall back to the WEB-DL. Will dropping to 10 bit make a difference on a 1080p(/i) blu ray? My current set up is too old to trust comparison, and want to futureproof for new tv. I may consider x265 for 4K HDR content however, but for 1080p SDR I'll stick with x264. . mkv It is upscaled 4K, but I think the source used was much higher quality than the bluray, because I've seen multiple bluray upscales of this movie that didn't look anywhere near this good. x265 is just the most "efficient" codec available right now. 2160p. 1 ImE) What are Your X265 Release Group as of END 2019 List: x265 [All File Sizes] PSA,TiGole,QxR,UTR,Vyndros only X264 8bit SDR & Only X265 10bit HDR [Only Huge File Size] TERMiNAL, IAMABLE, WhiteRhino, AViATOR, Framestor Is a 60 minute show extracted from a 1080P Blu-ray, with a file size of 2GB over 60 minutes (x265 HEVC 10bit) higher quality than a 1080P stream on a service like Apple TV or Amazon? I've also found some 4K rips with a similar file size and better audio. Also bluray and webdl would be h265, not x265. 44gb with 28. x265 means reencoded from the source, while remux/webdl are direct repacked copies. I believe WEB is the same thing as WEB-DL. Personally, I download only Remuxes and then encode them to x265. WEB-DL - This is a direct download of the video provided by the streaming service Its misleading to do the same thing with x265 and then give x265 the credit when what you are seeing is compressing something just enough that you can't notice it, like a JPG. It's an encode of the disc. Put differently, you need half the bitrate in an x265 stream to achieve the same visual results as an x264 stream. MADAME WEB – Official Trailer Last time I tried encoding movies, 1080p is a bit of a wash when it comes to x264 vs x265 in terms of file size/quality and x264 actually wins for anything lower res than 1080p. The formats are different, but the idea is the same. ), anime vs. 26*). x265 is a more efficient codec, particularly for 4k content, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s better or worse quality than an x264. 2012. No, there is no reason, the HDRip is a fake SD rip that's been upscaled, it's garbage compared to the HMAX verison you're talking about Edit: Just saw you're talking about some weird derivative version of the HMAX version, is it like the rarbg version or something? Just curious what people think about Blu-ray content compressed by x264 vs the same content compressed by NVENC H265 on an Ampere or Turing card like the RTX 20/30 for example. Seeing quite a few misconceptions about the sound files here in the comments. I had an old PC that became a jet engine when running a x265 hevc, where as x264 ran quietly. 10bit. Web-DL file size varies but can be large due to high-quality sources. When I compress a Blu-ray for my Plex server, I am using NVENC H265 through BD Rebuilder on CQM 24 (Constant Quality mode) on the default speeds. Why is x265/HEVC not more common? meaning, the x264 release is an encode (probably from a blu ray) and the h264 one is a webdl (from itunes, netflix, amazon or whatever). The main difference seems to be RERIP vs regular BluRay. I know the handbrake transcodes for h. Apr 7, 2024 · Furthermore, Blu-ray Rips maintain this high quality, making them preferable for enthusiasts who prioritize top-notch audiovisual experiences. Iuse makemkv to grab the movie/episodes and put them in a movie file. It heavily depends on the movie/show. Knight. WEB-DL 1080p from iTunes looks like complete shit though, 720p WEB-DL is to prefer unless we're talking amazon/NetFlix. mkv Alien Resurrection 1997 SE (1080p x265 10bit Tigole). R5 has a smaller file size than Blu-ray and DVD rips. The 4K is all-new, the Blu Ray in the pack is the same one from many years ago). x265-RARBG torrents have been replaced by 1080p. 265 and h. I checked this a few times and their x265 settings are such that they exacerbate the grain effect, making grain look even worse than on a remux. One is an Amazon Web DL 1080p at 10,000 bitrate and 13. AVC is Bluray or remux again. This because they state the WEB-DL's (Rips) have become of better quality over the years and can be used equal (not always though). Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 1080p Remux vs 2160p Web Download . Webdl isn't the source. Full story: I rip my 1080p blu-rays to then stream through plex. So which one do i watch?! BluRay set uncensored/extended cuts OR Netflix’s 4k treatment? 🤔 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Depends on the codec. Web-DL originates from online streaming services, while Blu-ray comes from physical discs with higher video and audio quality. Then you have stuff like buffy that was absolutely butchered in the remastering for blu ray the color is off, you can see cast and crew because it was never meant to be seen wide screen etc. x265 requires multiple cores that some older systems don't have. 0 just came out a few days ago and the ffmpeg plugin for it won't be updated until 5. X265. i want to download a movie that has 2 options: x265 10bit (29. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. 1/7. Just disable them. HEVC-PSA (done as release title, not release group as I think PSA has some lower quality releases also) elite 1080p. Sometimes a bluray will be remastered/upscaled, and these remasters could be done very well or very badly. I have the blu ray set so I figure it's time to get that digitized. Does anyone know why this is happening? Jun 6, 2023 · Blu-ray's Bitrate and Color Depth Advantage A 1080p Blu-ray disc typically has a much higher bitrate than a 4K compressed video stream. In short, Season 4 Part 1 had fewer Blu-ray differences than Season 1, but far above any of the other seasons (both when adjusting for episode count and not). Its not a miracle, its not a panacea, but real world you can expect a well encoded ~5-7gb x265 copy to be comparable in quality to an ~8-10gb AVC copy. t0paz, pof, pahe, ivy megusta I use 10-bit x265 and Opus/AAC 5. Check every couple days, replace files in directories, add a few more. # what will look best on a 50' 4K HDR TV: Peacemaker 2022 S01 1080p BluRay REMUX AVC DTS HD MA 5 1 FGT ORARBG (74. 5. FILE 1: Baby Driver (2017) (2160p BluRay x265 HEVC 10bit HDR AAC 7. 5mbits iirc across all of my content. Encode in H. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Movie. Its all about the bitrate. It’s the complete series on BluRay and it apparently has uncensored/extended episodes. Also because the 4k movies I usually obtain are 60 - 100 gb uhd remuxes and not 4k web-dls and I usually find web-dl to be lower in quality than Blu ray even with a higher Bitrate. I tested with a number of movies, old I've been downloading recent movies (2020-2021) and I noticed that the usual 1080p. When they produce a blu ray, they can take a 500GB file of a movie which can be a RAW file, and encode it down to fit onto a blu ray. 1 or 2. How to Convert WEBRip to Blu-ray Oh okay cool. WEB-DL vs Bluray for 4k HDR content So I'm trying to get some thoughts before being able to do a proper comparison. Remuxes are usually straight from the source (Bluray, UHD Bluray, etc) which tend to have the best quality. Remuxes are usually x265, because why not. A remux is when you rip a Blu-ray/DVD without transcoding the video. the format and software required to decode the video. 89gb, 2229 kbps) The file size is proportional to the bitrate irrespective of encoding. x265-LAMA McLaren. Just to be clear. so done a bit of digging and found plenty of 1080p x265 with 24 frame rate. BDRip is the same as BRRip. No re-encoding his been done so it's the best quality and very large. g 1080p. The Blu-ray will typically offer better sound, but the streamed video can also offer HDR. 265 anyway. Not relevant to your question but I would suggest looking through other encodes for a better experience with just a 1-2GB difference. Blu-ray (BD) is a legal commercial disc. BDMV is the raw folder on the Blu-ray disc. The x265 project is based on the x264 code so they're very similar to one another, though obviously they implement different encoding. PS: Bluray AVC is untouched is more better>Remux>x265>Web~Bluray x264 AC3 is audio codec. mkv GENERAL INFO SOURCE : UHD Blu-ray Disc CYBER (Thanks!) x265 achieves, on average, 2x the compression of x264. they are indeed either renaming RARBG releases or RARBG are also releasing them under a 2nd name. To compare this to other seasons, I recommend you to look here. WEB-DL is NOT the same as Webrip WEB-DL tend to have worse sound quality. With x265, i use main10, 10bit, veryslow with crf 20, i also set deblock to -1,-1 to get a kind of "film" tune due to x265 not having that tune specifically. Blu-ray is a popular file format often used in Blu-ray discs. 1 surround sound (5 speakers + 1 subwoofer). X264 VS X265, Software encoding VS Hardware, 8-bit encoding VS 10-bit encoding, single-pass encoding VS two-pass encoding, then we have which software is better, to debate. WEB-DL is an exact 1:1 Remux of the original video/audio stream from iTunes/Amazon, it's always the best quality. 0 with the occasional AC3 5. 265 RF 17. BRip and BDRip are sourced from Blu-ray discs; legality depends on distribution. 5. UHD. There is no correct answer. Bluray could mean a lot of things perhaps a encode or maybe the full disk image you have to check the torrent files to be sure. Also, x265 requires more power, which shortens the life of your system and makes it run harder. I have a 4k OLED and I spent a lot of time trying to see if I could tell a difference between a high-quality x265 encode and the Remux. Theres no such thing as optimal bitrate because it depends so heavily on the specific show and also your eyes. Decryption is an important part of ripping Blu-ray directly but I do it even with the non encrypted Blu-ray files that I get. You probably wouldn't notice a quality difference between that and a good rip to a lossier format, but potentially in the future there will be superior formats that you may wish to use and you will get better results encoding from the original than transcoding from, say, x265. This generally determines how good the video compression is. x265 17RF is the same as AV1 25RF for constant quality, assuming all other settings the same, and speed set to medium (x265) and 5 (AV1) No and it's not even close. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS 2160 x265 vs 1080p x264 on 1080p TV . Generally speaking, a 4K HDR stream has the potential to provide a superior viewing experience equal to or greater than a 1080p Blu disc. 265 take a long time. More Private Trackers are accepting BluRay Rips as equals to WEB-DL (Like Amazon). Both GalaxyRG and Asiimov are fairly low bitrate and are probably not great rips. x265 is still far too slow on my 8C/16T i7 for me to even consider. The Breaking Bad Blu-ray also has DTS-HD MA 5. Or check it out in the app stores 1080p x264 vs 720p x265 . Files sizes ~1/4 (modern, no grain) to 1/2 (older, grainy). A Blu-Ray will always give a better image quality if encoded with the same settings regardless if it's x264 or x265 X264 vs X265 is more a matter of size. 265 is not going to be useful if you are using a web browser to view the video. x265 (release titles), with negated required exclusions of ALL x265 groups, listed out 1 by 1. Typically those of us that go for web releases are looking for the best storage to quality ratio Sure Ex. The files stored on a Blu-ray however, may be lossless but usually contain a video encoded with H. RERIP. Definitely 4k web-dl. my pc wasnt a potato but isn't the top end either, and i use vlc or iina, so noy sure whats the prob, but leaning towards the potatoness of my pc. 1 (hdtv) For Season 4 Part 1, there are in total 1,048 changed scenes in the Blu-ray. x265, 1080p. Pitch perfect mixing with incredible Atmos and sound design. If I want to maximize quality as was the case for my Dune Bluray I just encoded, I went with CQ20 Slow 10-bit x265. Go for a high efficiency codec (HEVC, VP9, AV1), especially if you want to save storage & bandwidth but also have decent hardware & software. In this case (Day after tomorrow) the decision was easy and I deleted the bluray from my collection and kept the HDR web-dl. For a typical 2 hour movie you're looking at around 30GB for a 1080p Remux, 15GB once it's been compressed with x264 or around 5GB once it's been compressed with x265. I think the bluray looks good but without the IMAX shots I don't think it's incredible. Haha yes the questions came because of that. I would definitely go for BluRay Rips, unless not available at that time. The Dark Knight Rises (2012) (2160p BluRay x265 HEVC 10bit HDR AAC 5. (e. A webdl is the entire video file as it was streamed via the website. As far as I know, WEBRip is worse quality than the BluRay equivalent. 1-TERMiNAL +2061 Radarr ends up choosing the 2nd one that is scored 2000 lower. 3mb/s bitrate) vs x264 (30. i tried dl'ing the 50gb type files b4, but somehow it will stutter when i play it, like its too heavy for my computer, while the few gb ones will play fine. 84gb with 27. Its not quite a transparent encode, the full remux will still be slightly better, but a 5gb HEVC copy will look better than Netflix usually at least. WEBRip. In this case the x265 means the person reencoded the remux, lowering the quality, in order to make it h265 and lower the size. 265) compression format. Dolby True-HD, DTS-HD Master Audio, and LPCM are all lossless surround sound formats used on blu-ray. Although a Blu-ray is compressed as well. Webdl is compressed by the streaming company. Basically a higher Bitrate 1080p rip will look better on a 4k TV than a lower Bitrate 4k rip? Sometimes both discs in the pack are beneficiaries of the 4K remaster, and sometimes the Blu Ray is the older/previous master (my copy of American Psycho comes to mind. heys, thanks for the reply. Online streams, even at 4K, are somewhat bitrate starved to minimize buffering. Prime video removed the x-files. 1 Tigole) : 11. But since most Blu-ray bitrates are very high, you won't notice much difference from the source, which btw you don't have access to. On my 65" OLED, I found that x265 crf18 or 19 slow was indistinguishable from the original bluray in motion, depending on the original film. 3 GB) or Peacemaker 2022 S01 "x265 4K web-DL" Tells me someone downloaded a 4k version of the movie, from Netflix or YouTube or similar, and then re-encoded it with x265. So bitrate is only part of the equation. AVC) Not necessarily. Digital vs (lots of) film grain, how much work was done on the raw (filtering, denoising etc. Trailers, menus and stuff are omitted. Another dilemma i often have is deciding whether to download a vyndros Blu-ray season pack vs a x264 Blu-ray season pack from rovers, shortbred, etc. 1 most of the time. But there's some optimizations that you can make to grab as much grain as possible using x265. There is no proof that at high bitrates x265 easily outperforms x264. When you want a movie to be 2160p AND x265, set that profile and tag. I'd honestly like to see that. WEBRip is when they record the output using an HDMI capture card. 264 and a high quality (normally not lossless but still much higher than average) Dolby Atmos audio format. Honestly, I don't have DVD settings that I am entirely satisfied with. H. If you see a 2160p x265 encode movies that's only like 1GB The streaming image is usually sharper and more detailed but the Blu-ray image is undoubtedly more stable, especially when it comes to more complicated shots with lots of moving parts or darker scenes. 1 Tigole) [QxR] +4350 The. which one should look better? thx x265 has a bit smaller filesizes (~30% or so), but require more CPU to decode and is less widely available on media players (smart TVs etc. The sound of the DUNE 4k bluray is where it really shines in my opinion. So 20 mbps x264 is closer to 10mbps x265. 1 or AC3 5. That’s typically what I stream. Anything less they're essentially the same thing. They audio and video are untouched from the original source. If you zoom way in (these are 4K screenshots) you can actually see stuff like the dots on Daft Punk's costumes whereas on the bluray it's just blurry. All I can say is, the 1080p Remux is guaranteed to look good while the 4K WEB-DL will be a hit or miss. 1080p. x265, RARBG x264s are much better than their x265s (for movies with grain). Archiving it? only if there is no bluray release or up until that point. I have a Ryzen 5900x and I still get roughly 2fps on the x265 10-bit veryslow preset and 3. It is kinda annoying since ive downloaded sonarr v3 and excluded WEBrip from the WEB category so it only downloads WEB-DL's. X265 is about twice as efficient in compression compared to x264. If disk space isn't an issue, then an archival copy would be a bit-for-bit exact clone of the original disc. If you don’t think physical media quality is superior to streaming, that’s totally fine. e. 1 DD+ audio for nearly similar size with a 100% upgrade in quality. If I were to switch to x265 encodes, my server would be transcoding files 24/7. But a ~2gb x265 Joybell release is gonna look way worse than an ~8gb x264 FGT copy. Better Call Saul 1080p S05 x265 from RARBG is 8gb in size and all the subtitles are in a separate folder Better Call Saul 1080p S05 x264 from ITSALLGOODMAN is 55gb but the foreign subtitles are baked in Then there is a Better Call Saul S05 BDRip x265 from ION265 is 3. 1mb/s bitrate). x264/x265" (e. Most top-tier private trackers don't even allow x265 encodes unless they are HDR, because x265 sacrifices a lot of quality for a smaller file size x265 takes a much longer time to encode that x265, especially on older hardware I have the Ralph Steadman BluRay Steelbook Set. But due to the focus of this sub, your headline is going to mislead people to think you’re saying the new 4K discs are the same quality as the old As for x264 vs x265, these are software projects that are fairly widely used in programs like FFmpeg or HandBrake. There are lossless video formats, Blu-ray isn't one, Blu-ray is just a bigger DVD and a DVD is just a storage medium like a USB. x265 is newer and better than x264. Next day download for most new shows instead of waiting for BluRay releases just before the new season starts. Hello guys, I just bought my first 4K TV (LG OLED65C9) and I want to start getting some 4K movies. It will preserve HDR and the wide color format in 4K blu-rays, but it will also decrease the size and decrease color banding on videos that aren’t 4K blu-rays, and it’s supported on basically every device that supports H. A 7-8gb x265 encode is very good when compared to a 40+ GB bluray rip for most use cases Both releases provided by OP are not encodes but WEB-DL decrypts and are 15. Rises. BluRay Rip -> above WebRip in most cases. The souce bluray/webdl for two shows both in 1080p could be wildly different in size. Just based on personal tests i'm still leaning that x265 is producing a higher quality output with 'Slow' preset and aq-mode=3 vs something like Preset 4 AV1 with equal bitrates. Feel free to prove me wrong, if you can. (that’s what it says on some of the J-cards for them) However, i just saw that Netflix is streaming it in 4k. With device support very limited, even more limited for 10bit Direct Play, you lose the benefit of choosing x265 over x264. I have the Blu-ray set and also redeemed the code through iTunes. 1 Silence) Planet Farth (2006) Special Edition (2160p Al x265 FS84 Joy) Planet Earth II (2016) Season 1 SO1 (2160p Blu Ray x265 HEVC 10bit HDR AAC 5. Some streaming services have much higher quality video than others. Question/Advice I'm in the process of x265 2160p HDR releases are lower in file sizes and have more seeds. 976 (24000/1001) FPS / BT. You set x265 to a very high quality metric at the expense of a ton of storage. For example, Cocaine Bear is available on Apple TV to purchase with DV, but the UHD Blu-ray only has HDR10. 2017. 42gb and the subtitles are in a separate folder like before. Blu-ray you get anywhere from 25-40mbps. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. It depends on how much you notice. I don't know tracker where they release but group called BeiTai is pretty much active in releasing x265 BluRay DTS-HD encodes and their size is from 7GB and above. There’s a great free Blu-ray ripping software called MakeMKV that’ll create an MKV of just about any BD movie, no other software required for it to work properly. WEB-DL refers to it being originally ripped from a web source, like Netflix, rather than a rip from a BluRay or other physical medium. 4K Blu-ray is even higher, not sure what the max rate is on there. The primary problem is running out of hard disk space on the NAS. so the best copy is the SD DVD version. You may want to see them like release groups. I realize that WEB-DL and Bluray are much better than HDTV but I thought 1080p would still look better on a 1080p screen unless the 1080p rip is truly garbage. On a pixel level, yes there is loss in detail. Common lossy audio formats used for video are Dolby Digital and DTS. With the release of Captain Marvel, there is a good quality 4k iTunes DL available. Most Blu-rays are also natively in H. I personally have the majority of my shows as 1080 web-dl strictly because of the releases. Web-DL files are smaller, making them easier to download or stream, whereas Blu-ray files are larger and may require more storage space. Now create a new required tag for x265 and add all the "265" varients like x265, h265, x. AAC is the audio codec, i. the format and software required to decode the audio. As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. That is a very basic overview, but it should give you the I would say from least quality to best is HDTV > WEB-DL > Blu-Ray. The x265 is going to be the smallest file; it's the most efficient trade off between size and quality. The proper name is "BluRay. The invention of Blu-ray was to replace DVD file formats, which offered reduced quality and reduced storage space in DVDs. x265-RARBG torrents. x265 2160p SDR releases are larger in file sizes, and I have found that SDR just seem to have a lot brighter colours and more vivid than HDR releases of the same thing, or am I wrong? Negative of SDR: I have found that most SDR Releases mention that they are converted from HDR? In terms of x264 vs. ) but is gaining a lot of traction. x265. Whenever possible, I try to find the Blu-ray version or HD WEB-DL version of old DVD content I have. I've yet to see a single 720p x265 encode that beats an x264 encode at the same file size. At least around 1500kbit/sec with 2-pass/3-pass (AV1 uses 3 pass). tem uhoavsh psus ytkdkq ndkc ilrry zaztm imiosmw jlfgbgc lqaoj