Awaiting reviewer selection emerald Go to 5 if accepted, 6 if rejected, or 7 if revisions are required. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision would be a relatively faster process. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Accept . After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, My paper underwent a revision. We are pleased to announce our 2022 Literati Award winners. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. Quote. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . Revisions. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. On the journal’s side, although slowly, but the manuscript seems to be progressing. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. This study aims to focus on sustainable supplier selection in a Ownership with a green twist: the role of top managers in driving environmental innovation Shanshan Yue, Norkhairul Hafiz B. During reject and resubmit, I got I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. There is no set time for this to take. Submitted a paper 10 days back in Emerald and status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Invitation". co. Sociology Job Market Rumors The team selects reviewers from our database, who have similar expertise to those listed in the keywords on the paper. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. We are very grateful for the contributions made. The submission is now with the author. The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). Thank you. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. patience is key Guest. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Asked by Hend Okasha on 01 May, 2021 . thanks a lot. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; Share. The editor selects up to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria. I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. 4. com To: peter@pmsd. سوال: مقاله ای را به مجلهای ارسال کردم وضعیت آن از Awaiting AE assignment به Awaiting Referee Selection و سپس Awaiting Referee Assignment تغییر کرد. Khatib, Mohammed Naif Alshareef. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Application The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. The reviewers are contacted and invited to review the manuscript. 1. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the fretting wear performance of ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethene (UHMWPE) with addition of GO and SiO 2. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. This person is an in-house editor, therefore, a guest editor is not required. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same Further information. Also, please note that peer reviewers are quite busy too. Awaiting Reviewer Selection I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. We have everything to help you become a more established reviewer. I sent a message back to Mr Michael Fang, Emerald Country Manager for Mainland China, on 13 June 2007 and started exploring the possibility of co-operation on an English-language journal – CAER. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Petrus Sutyasadi with you listed as a co-author. With their help, the journal has been able to publish such high-quality articles: Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. . This access is valid for a 90 day period from when you receive your access notification. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. The review process may take place pre- or post-publication, and reports may Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Emerald Studies in Finance, Insurance, and Risk Management; Emerald Studies in Gender, Sexuality and Education; Emerald Studies in Global Strategic Responsiveness; Emerald Studies in Higher Education, Innovation and Technology; Emerald Studies in Islamic Economy and Finance; Emerald Studies in Metal Music and Culture I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. ). What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 "Awaiting AE decision" has lasted for 如果状态显示“等待分配审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment/Selection）”，则手稿很有可能会被送审。 让我们了解一下投稿之后，稿件的状态是如何变化的。论文投稿后，必须先经过编辑筛选。 My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. The manuscript was submitted by Dr. This study found that digital platform capability has a positive impact on a B2B firm’s performance. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. The journal told me Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Emerald & Elsevier want journals that will take an international focus, What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers who have not yet completed their reviews. 有作者咨询：论文状态awaiting reviewer assignment 的意思，这是初审环节的一个状态，代表等待分配审稿专家，在整个sci论文发表过程中，论文状态会有多个变化，具体说明如下： 1、编辑初审阶段会看到的状态 Manuscript Submitted/Manuscript received by Editorial Office——投稿已到杂志社 Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of corporate sustainability performance on the Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. Findings. This paper aims to introduce an innovative decision SiO2 modified graphene oxide hybrids for improving fretting wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene Xiaocui Xin, Yunxia Wang, Zhaojie Meng, Fengyuan Yan. Maybe the editor found a reviewer before changing the manuscript's status, so it passed through the "awaiting reviewer assignment" stage in a single step. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. Reviewer feedback on the paper will be provided to the corresponding author. Does it mean it has crossed desk rejection stage? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. Reviewers should provide complete and detailed comments on submitted papers. But all of a sudden, The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. Click on “Take Action. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Reviewers should meet as many of the criteria below as possible: The reviewer’s field of study and emphasis is confirmed. Review and selection of manuscripts All submissions will first be subject to an in-house evaluation process with respect to suitability for BLC in terms of quality, content and methodology. The manuscript was submitted by Prof. Note, if the paper is outside the journal’s scope, the editor may reject it and suggest it is transferred to a more relevant A multi-criteria approach to egress location selection in buildings: integrating economic, technical and social factors Ruken Alac, Ahmed W. You will receive an email from the Editor containing the final decision. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. How manufacturers make decision of digital service collaboration in ecosystem: a niche selection perspective Yaqi Zhang , Danfeng Geng , Jing Wang , Juhong Chen The purpose of this study is to investigate how manufacturers make collaborative decisions in the ecosystem in the context of digital servitization. Bajuri, Saleh F. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. I have previously published in the same journal Further information. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE It may be as simple as making the author and reviewers known to one another, or the reviews – and the reviewers’ names – may be published alongside the article. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". AE stands for Associate Editor. Journal Selection. Post Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. This study aims to explore the relationship between managerial ownership and environmental innovation, particularly focusing on the impact of minority shareholder protection Issue 3 2016 Deepening reform for China's long-term growth and development: the role of rural development A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. Further information. So, please give me to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations The editor notifies the author that their paper has been accepted The editor notifies the author that their paper Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Hammad, Ali Hadigheh, Aaron Opdyke. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Dec 3, 2015 9:59:30 GMT -5 . In the first notification, I got a major revision. 3. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. ’ What does this mean? What are the next steps of publication? If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Can someone please let me know what they actually mean? Thank you very much in advance! Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Wait! It is not late yet. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same The final decision lies with the editor. What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. You could be recognised for your efforts; each year editors are asked to nominate outstanding reviewers for our Literati Awards. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. A multi-criteria approach to egress location selection in buildings: integrating economic, technical and social factors Ruken Alac, Ahmed W. So, ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ means the associate editor (AE) is awaiting the peer reviewer’s comments and evaluation of the paper. " Does this The status of my submission changed from Admin: Not Assigned to EA: [name] plus Awaiting ED assignment plus Awaiting CE decision at Scholarone manuscripts. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. As per the status description, it seems that the manuscript's initial editorial screening is done and the editor is now looking for reviewers. Reviewers may be requested to review manuscripts up to three times per year. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? So, we have made some edits/assumptions. " Related reading: Why I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 2. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. I for example look at my assignments once a week. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. This would explain the status change from The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. See all 'how to' We offer tools, support and dedicated publishing and licensing services for authors, editors, librarians, reviewers and researchers as well as associations, universities and organisations. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations. However, I just noticed that the status of my A chance came again when the Emerald office in Beijing dropped me a message about the co-operation in publishing journals. t backed up) Further information. Note, if the paper is outside the journal’s scope, the editor may reject it and suggest it is transferred to a more relevant Emerald journal. 3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the Further information. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. This is a placeholder queue that does not require I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. a) Is it Sustainable supplier selection in a construction company: a new MCDM method based on dominance-based rough set analysis Arpit Singh, Vimal Kumar, Pratima Verma. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. The status was displayed as ‘Accepted,’ but after that, it has been ‘Awaiting JEO Checking. Again, the Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. We'll support you with submission, Reply-To: emerald@coastlinetechnology. Check their publication record; Check their institutional page for their specialities within a field of study and what they focus on; The reviewer is familiar with all aspects of the manuscript Thank you for your question. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations. This is the process in IMEFM, and how long it takes: Process Stage Time taken Assign to 2. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. The journal told me As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Also, Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. Without reviewers continuing to commit time and passion to their peer review role, the integrity of research would be harder to uphold. 5. ac. Please note that Emerald requires you to clear permission to re-use any material not created by you. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) All journal articles in IMEFM go through a double blind review process, this means if a submission is conditionally accepted, it will go through several reviewer processes. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". Bambang Tjahjadi with you listed as a co-author. g. This change has occurred The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found As such, to maintain trust in the integrity of the published record, Emerald does not permit the use of AI tools or LLMs to assist in the review, evaluation, or decision-making process of any part of an article, case study, or chapter by either a member of a journal’s Editorial Team or a reviewer, in accordance with Emerald’s principles of peer review. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. I didnt see the "under review Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". But my question is as below. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. OR. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. (The journal I submitted to Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Emerald publishing services Partner with us for an expert publishing service for your journal. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Sociologist 95d. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Issue 1 2017 Sustainability, institutions, and internationalization in emerging markets: role of sustainable innovation for sustainable world development The current status is still awaiting reviewer invitation. This may, however, vary across journals. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Peer review is a crucial step through the process and since your process was run through double peer reviews, the amount of time taken could be justified. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. If you’re reviewing a book, journal or article, and you’re looking for support including practical tips and guidance, take a look at our reviewer guides. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, The final decision lies with the editor. id 20-Jun-2019 (IR-06-2019-0135) has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors. Answer. Reviewers should return their reviews within 30 days. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. EU corporate sustainability performance and qualified audit opinion: the role of audit committee independence Panagiotis Dimitropoulos. However, on the same day, the Recently Announced. Outstanding Paper Determinants of international marketing strategy for emerging market multinationals 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. Then I revised and resubmitted. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2021 reviewers for this journal. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Improve this question. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. A. 12 Dec 2024 Asia-Pacific Conference on Economics and Finance ‘LIVE’ As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Select Post; Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. But all of a sudden, If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. id, petrussutyasadi@yahoo. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply. If there are passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. At Emerald, we believe that fair I submitted my manuscript to a journal. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Is this normal? It should be easy to send the paper to the previous referees. Becoming and being a peer reviewer is an important role to play in the scholarly landscape. I submitted my paper in January. If the reviewers agree, they provide their comments to the editorial team and the paper is then returned to the author with a decision and editorial and reviewer Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". However, today, I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Reviewers must not distribute any manuscripts reviewed or disclose information from the reviewed manuscripts. But the editor, for some reason, e. This paper aims to introduce an innovative decision-making framework designed to optimize egress location selection in buildings, significantly enhancing safety during Further information. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; After submitting for the revisions, my paper was selected by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the Emerald Publishing journal, Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences (JHASS). Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. What does this status mean? Thanks in advance. In this section . This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. In the case of some journals, a ‘technical editor’ means a peer reviewer, as the peer reviewer has the technical expertise in the subject of the paper. But all of a sudden, I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Resource identification, resource allocation and intrapreneurship play a chain mediating role between digital platform capability and firm performance. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. AE stands for "Associate Editor. Related reading: Does a status change from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting editor decision" imply rejection? Reviewing for an Emerald journal entitles you to free personal access to up 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding backfiles). fbpu tkt nzeq ptak oisfedq zpi fmdb jwit iogme nldhb